#Zerene stacker vs photoshop free
You can buy them for much cheaper and it cleans the sensor chemical free and without haven't to physically touch it. I find a good item to use when cleaning a camera sensor is an air blower like this one here. John - You are right, Liveview does make the sensor a lot more exposed. McConkey wrote:Gekko - I believe it might be dust, however the images belong to Johann and are not mine, I just posted the results from Picolay using the 20images that were provided earlier in the thread. if you would like I could upload the result from Helicon Focus Method "B" for comparison) Select Image #1 as the "source" and simply retouch the entire background from image #1.
In Zerene, When the stack is completed, go to "Start Retouching". In this particular image it is very easy to retouch that. But when run a stack and you allow x/y shifting, or magnification changes, you will get the dust "trails" (Much less so with Helicon Focus Method "B"). Not too bad if you are re-touching a single image. In these cases be sure the brightness adjustment is checked. When you have a soft, out of focus background it can get pretty shabby looking when there are some significant exposure variation in the frames. Don't know why, the exposure times are the same). I noticed in the source files there is a significant difference in brightness with some (the last few especially are much brighter. You should get a hugely improved rendition than the one you posted. When, halfway through the stack, the program shows a slider to set the threshold use about 84% for this stack. Don't use any "auto" value for the threshold setting in preferences. I downloaded your source files and had a look.
0 kommentar(er)
