While you could say the cartoon is, for an easy comparison, FarCry.
Crysis is aiming to make photo realistic effects, adding to the immersiveness. I believe that is the point most people are trying to make. While both are generally computer generated, one is much more easy on the eyes to believe it's actual reality. Most people are saying that it's adding to the immersiveness.įace it, watching a good CG move (such as Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within for example), is far more immersive than watching good cartoon (for lack of a better comparison). I don't think anybody here is saying that graphics are making the gameplay in Crysis. There is a ridiculous amount of hype surrounding Crysis simply because of how pretty it looks, yet there is very little to suggest that this game will be anything another than a polished version of Far Cry except some Nano-suit powers and some fancy physics which may or may not add to the gameplay. But its even better if it turns out to be a great game that takes you by surprise with its quality. I'm just saying, if anything its more beneficial to be sceptical about a game before its release, because if it turns out to be a bad game then you're not surprised and you're glad you didn't waste your money on it. It was easily the best looking game ever when it was released back in 2004, but goddamn was it such an average game. Most of the time, the environment feel like any other game with slightly better conceptual design.Īnd the people who think Crysis looks like it will have great gameplay and are having a go at those who don't, there is a reason why alot of people aren't convinced that great graphics equals great gameplay. Gears of War had some of the best graphics i've ever seen, but i wouldn't call Gears of War particularly immersive. Although I must say I like the premise of fighting the Korean, human, soldiers a lot more than fighting aliens.ĭon't like the whole 'nanosuit' thing, looks cheesy. The story doesn't look that horrible, a frozen tropic seems like an original and interesting setting to place a game in. Hopefully Crytek can implement the great combat into a good overall game. However, Halo also had great combat (best yet I think) but they didn't really succeed making it a good game overall. Although with HL this varies, the explosions are very good but many guns feel kind of lackluster. Many games, including HL2 (and I'm a huge HL fan), can't really get the feel of combat right. Shooting and blowing shit up looks fun in this game.
The bullet impacts, the explosions, the environmental destruction add a lot to the 'feel' of combat. Good combat visuals make combat a whole lot more fun and Crysis definitely has the best combat visuals up to date. Graphics ARE very important to a game, graphics is the thing that needs to convince you this is a real world you're walking around in.Īnd the graphics do add a lot of value to Crysis, just take a look at the combat visuals.
#Crysis mods photorealistic Pc
O, more clich?s please! Stop ondervalueing graphics, just like you couldn't say "motherboard > CPU" (your PC wouldn't do a damn thing without either) games that try to bring a convincing world wouldn't work without the graphics.
0 kommentar(er)
